However, his plea was rejected by the apex court.
Senior advocates Kapil Sibal, Anoop George Chaudhari, Rajeev Dhavan and Sushil Jain will represent other parties including All India Sunni Waqf Board and Nirmohi Akhara.
Additional Solicitor General (ASG) Tushar Mehta, representing the State of Uttar Pradesh rebutted all the allegations made by Kapil Sibal.
Reacting to Sibal's stand, BJP president Amit Shah said it's very surprising for a Congress leader to appeal for a Muslim body and appealing for defering of a case related to Ram temple at a time when Rahul Gandhi is visisting temples as part of his election strategy.
New Settlement Expected to Close Hariri's Resignation File, Test Lebanon's Dissociation Policy
The policy had already been adopted by Hariri's cabinet, formed in 2016 after a settlement across political divides. Saudi Arabia and Hariri have denied this.
The Supreme Court has taken our middle ground formula on Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid title heated discussion on record, affirms Syed Wasim Rizvi, chairman of the Shia Central Waqf Board. "They should clarify their stand", Shah said.
"On the one hand, temples are being visited (by Rahul Gandhi) ahead of elections. Rahul ji should tell us what is his view on this".
Supreme Court had said that all those parties, in the case, who are now dead can be replaced by legal heir/substitute for the proceedings.
"The Sunni Waqf Board wanted to delay the hearing in the case. Or, is it the case that the board and the Congress are working in tandem?"
Billy Bush to Trump: 'Enough's enough'
Bush told Colbert: "You've got 20 women ... who used their names". "I'm anxious that the dialogue isn't going to be around". At the time of the tape, Trump's show, " The Apprentice ", was one of NBC's biggest headliners.
However, the Congress distanced itself from the issue. "As a client, if Kapil Sibal has been asked to do something, it can not be linked to Congress", Congress leader Brijesh Kalappa told a news channel. "Who he represents in court is Kapil Sibal's personal matter, Congress has nothing to do with it". The court ordered each party a third of the land at the site.
"Congress's stand has always been clear, that Ayodhya case will be decided by the Supreme Court", he added.
Petitioners are pleaded in the Supreme Court for reasonable time to translate, file and serve the copies of all the exhibits and relevant documents, which were filed before the Allahabad High Court bench at Lucknow.
The stakeholders in the case had moved the apex court after the Allahabad High Court directed the Sunni Waqf Board, the Nirmohi Akhara and the Lord Ram Lalla to settle for a three-way division of the 2.77-acre disputed site.
Another Conyers Accuser Comes Forward, Says Congressman Groped Her in Church
His lawyer earlier said on Twitter that Conyers would make an announcement at 10:15 a.m. According to a New York Times report, the congressman plans to retire, not resign.